Search for: All records

Despite having practical applications in battery technology and serving as a model system for Fermi resonance coupling, ethylene carbonate (EC) receives little direct attention as a vibrational probe in nonlinear vibrational spectroscopy experiments. EC contains a Fermi resonance that is well-characterized in the linear spectrum, and the environmental sensitivity of its Fermi resonance peaks could make it a good molecular probe for two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy (2DIR) experiments. As a model system, we investigate the linear and 2DIR vibrational spectrum of the carbonyl stretching region of ethylene carbonate in tetrahydrofuran. The 2DIR spectrum reveals peak dynamics that evolve coherently. We characterize these dynamics in the context of Redfield theory and find evidence that EC dynamics proceed through coherent pathways, including singular coherence transfer pathways that have not been widely observed in other studies. We find that coherent contributions play a significant role in the observed dynamics of cross-peaks in the 2DIR spectrum, which must be accounted for to extract accurate measurements of early waiting time dynamics. 

Background:Programmes that provide scientists and engineers with support to engage in public policy have proliferated in the United States, with many opportunities available for training, networking and placements within government and government-facing organisations. This trend suggests that an evolution may be occurring at the science–policy interface. However, there is little extant data on the structure, aims and impacts of these programmes. Aims and objectives:This study maps the current landscape of US programmes seeking to train researchers at all career stages to engage in policy. We focus on Virginia, a state with a substantial number and diversity of programmes, to assess: (1) how they conceptualise their audiences, activities and impacts; and (2) which roles in policy and types of evidence use they address. Methods:We developed a database of US policy programmes (n=174) and conducted a case study of those in Virginia through surveys and interviews with their leaders (n=12). Findings:The majority (57%) of science policy programmes are state-based. These programmes include student organisations, government placements and fellowships, and academic certificates, degrees, and other trainings. While these reflect diverse models for how to engage researchers in policy, Virginia programme leaders across these categories similarly conceived long-term impacts, audiences and activities, researcher roles in policy, and types of decision-maker evidence use. And they perceived limited ability to implement evidence-based approaches within their programmes. Discussion and conclusion:Building additional programmatic capacity – through shared learning and partnerships – could lend support to this emerging trend in science policy with implications for US research and governance.